Intuitions as evidence
Read Online

Intuitions as evidence

  • 972 Want to read
  • ·
  • 70 Currently reading

Published by Garland Pub. in New York .
Written in English


  • Intuition

Book details:

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references (p. 125-132) and index.

StatementJoel Pust.
SeriesDissertations in philosophy
LC ClassificationsBD181 .P87 2000
The Physical Object
Paginationxiv, 135 p. ;
Number of Pages135
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL15582393M
ISBN 100815337639
LC Control Number99056458

Download Intuitions as evidence


Intuitions as Evidence. ISBN | Quantity: Shopping Cart Summary. Items: View Cart. Continue Shopping. Book Description. First published in Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company. Author(s) Biography. Joel Pust is at the University of Delaware. Book Series. DOI link for Intuitions as Evidence. Intuitions as Evidence book. Intuitions as Evidence. DOI link for Intuitions as Evidence. Intuitions as Evidence book. By Joel Pust. Edition 1st Edition. First Published eBook Published 11 January Pub. location New York. Imprint : Joel Pust. Ch. 1. The Use of Intuitions as Evidence in Philosophy --Ch. 2. The Nature of Philosophical Intuitions --Ch. 3. Empiricist Explanationist Skepticism About Intuitions --Ch. 4. Problems with the Empiricist Skeptical Argument --Ch. 5. Reliability, Epistemic Circularity, and the Undue Partiality of Empiricist Skepticism About Intuitions. Series Title. This book is concerned with the role of intuitions in the justification of philosophical theory. The author begins by demonstrating how contemporary philosophers, whether engaged in case-driven analysis or seeking reflective equilibrium, rely on intuitions as evidence for their theories.

COVID Resources. Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus. Editorial team. General Editors: David Bourget (Western Ontario) David Chalmers (ANU, NYU) Area Editors: David Bourget Gwen Bradford.   There is currently an important debate about whether philosophical intuitions are intended as evidence for the theories philosophers promote. On one side are those who argue that philosophers do rely on intuitions as evidence; on the other side are those who deny any such role for philosophical intuitions. Intuitions are often treated in philosophy as a basic evidential source to confirm/discredit a proposed definition or theory; e.g. intuitions about Gettier cases are taken to deny a justified-true-belief analysis of ‘knowledge’. Recently, Weinberg, Nichols & Stitch (WN&S) provided evidence that epistemic intuitions vary across persons and.

  Intuitions are good evidence; therefore, XYZ is not water. Therefore, externalism about content is true. Eddie: It's not rational to blindly treat your so-called "rational intuitions" as evidence. We can't calibrate our intuitions to check their reliability, and it's totally mysterious how it .   intuitions as evidence for/against various positions. And it is no doubt correct that standard attempts at philosophical analyses—the analysis of knowledge, rationality, justification, moral. Book Description: This book examines the evidential status and use of linguistic intuitions, a topic that has seen increased interest in recent years. Linguists use native speakers' intuitions - such as whether or not an utterance sounds acceptable - as evidence for theories about language, but this approach is not uncontroversial.   Read "Intuitions as Evidence" by Joel Pust available from Rakuten Kobo. First published in Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa : Taylor And Francis.